August 11, 2007

Will Democrats field candidates against Texas Court of Criminal Appeals?

By Scott Henson, Pegasus News

Court of Criminal Appeals

Texas elects our judges, and in the case of the Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals we have elected a group who Texas Monthly has called "Texas' worst
court," and who continue to affirm draconian sentences in the face of
legitimate "actual innocence" claims.

First DNA wasn't good enough to exonerate someone, now they're relying on
narrowly construed technicalities to refuse to consider new evidence in a
death case. Their recent decisions in criminal cases have been struck down
more often by the US Supreme Court than any other state's high court. In
short, they've become a national embarrassment.

But in 2006, Democrats ran no candidates against two of the three incumbents
who were up, and the Democrat who did run against CCA Chief wasn't a
legitimate candidate - J.R. Molina spent virtually nothing and refused to
even attend newspaper editorial board meetings. Still he got 43% of the
vote. By comparison Chris Bell, the Democratic gubernatorial candidate,
received 29%! Libertarians in the other two CCA races received that party's
highest totals in any statewide race.

As we head into the political season with primaries six months away, I'm
disappointed that no Democratic candidate nor Republican primary challenger
has stepped up so far to take on any CCA incumbent.

I had hoped Judge Susan Criss in Galveston might run for a CCA seat, but she
decided to pursue a slot on the Texas Supreme Court - more power to her and
good luck, but she would have been a great high court addition on the
criminal side, I thought.

Past Democratic Senate nominee Barbara Radnofsky is another name that's come
up as a good possibility for the CCA - she's got more name ID, especially
among Democrats, than a lot of potential candidates bring to the table, but
I haven't heard anything concrete about her plans. Rob Owen, one of the
attorneys who keeps getting CCA death penalty decisions knocked down at the
Supreme Court, is someone else who'd make a good CCA judge, and I wish he'd
throw his hat in the ring.

Somebody with experience or name ID would be good, but in the general
election at least it hardly matters. Think about the judicial and DA's races
in Dallas in 2006 - a lot of those folks didn't expect to win, but by
fielding candidates they were able to take advantage of opportunities
provided by larger, macro-level national events. Judicial seats are
downballot races, so candidates don't have to raise that much money, by
comparison with other statewide seats, to become real players.

That will also be true in 2008. Certainly much will depend on who are the
nominees at the top of the national ballot. But if, as in 2006, the general
electorate trends especially Democratic because of national issues like the
war, a campaign for these judicial seats against already weak incumbents
could earn the party its first statewide officeholders in years.

The issues for the race are clear, the discontent abundant, but it's
impossible to win without horses in the race. And hopefully not just
placeholders unwilling to run a real campaign, but candidates of whom the
Dems can be proud.

---

Source : Pegasus News

http://www.pegasusnews.com/news/2007/au ... our/?print